Navigate IRS & State Tax Debt: The Complete Guide to Expert Tax Relief and Financial Freedom

Expert guidance from William McConnaughy, CPA – Former IRS Revenue Agent

---

The calls started at 7 AM. First, it was the automated IRS collection line demanding immediate payment of $127,000. Then her state tax agency called about an additional $43,000 owed. By noon, her bank called to inform her that both agencies had frozen her business accounts. Her payroll was due Friday, she had 23 employees counting on their paychecks, and her entire financial world was collapsing around her.

This was the reality facing Jennifer, a successful restaurant owner, when multiple tax agencies decided to coordinate their collection efforts on the same day. What should have been a manageable tax problem had become a business-ending crisis that threatened everything she had worked 15 years to build.

But Jennifer’s story doesn’t end in financial ruin. Six months later, after strategic professional intervention, her federal tax debt was resolved through an Offer in Compromise for $18,000, her state tax issues were settled for $8,500, and her business was thriving again with proper tax compliance systems in place.

Jennifer’s transformation from crisis to success illustrates a crucial truth: when facing complex tax debt involving multiple agencies, the difference between financial disaster and financial freedom often comes down to one critical factor—the quality and timing of professional representation.

As a former IRS Revenue Agent who now represents taxpayers against both federal and state tax agencies, I’ve seen how quickly tax problems can escalate when multiple jurisdictions are involved, and I know exactly how to coordinate resolution strategies that protect your assets while achieving optimal outcomes across all agencies.

This comprehensive guide reveals the insider strategies and coordination techniques that can transform your multi-jurisdictional tax nightmare into a success story of financial recovery and long-term security.

---

The Hidden Complexity of Multi-Agency Tax Debt

When Tax Problems Multiply Exponentially

Most taxpayers don’t realize that owing taxes to multiple agencies creates exponentially more complex problems than simple federal or state tax debt alone. Each agency operates independently, with different rules, procedures, and collection powers that can conflict with each other and create devastating consequences.

The Coordination Problem:

• Federal IRS operates under federal tax laws and procedures
• State agencies follow different state laws and collection methods
• Local jurisdictions may have separate tax obligations and enforcement
• No coordination between agencies unless specifically negotiated
• Conflicting demands that can create impossible financial situations

Real-World Impact: When Jennifer faced simultaneous collection from federal and state agencies, the combined monthly payment demands totaled $4,200—more than her entire business profit. Neither agency cared about the other’s demands, and both were prepared to shut down her business to collect their portion.

The Cascade Effect: How Multi-Agency Problems Worsen

Tax debt involving multiple agencies often follows a predictable but devastating pattern:

Phase 1: Independent Development

• Federal issues develop independently (income taxes, payroll taxes, penalties)
• State problems arise separately (income taxes, sales taxes, employment taxes)
• Local obligations accumulate (business licenses, property taxes, local fees)
• Cross-reporting between agencies triggers additional scrutiny

Phase 2: Information Sharing

• Automatic reporting between federal and state agencies
• Joint investigations for significant cases
• Shared databases revealing assets and income sources
• Coordinated strategies for maximum collection efficiency

Phase 3: Coordinated Collection

• Simultaneous enforcement actions by multiple agencies
• Asset competition between agencies for limited resources
• Legal complications from conflicting collection procedures
• Business destruction from overwhelming collection pressure

Strategic Insight: Early intervention before agencies coordinate their collection efforts provides maximum options and best outcomes.

Understanding Agency Motivations and Conflicts

Each tax agency operates under different mandates, creating both opportunities and challenges for resolution:

Federal IRS Characteristics:

• Revenue focus: Primary goal is maximizing federal tax collection
• Standardized procedures: National procedures with limited local variation
• Settlement authority: Broad discretion for compromise and settlement
• Resource limitations: Large caseloads requiring efficient resolution

State Agency Characteristics:

• State revenue priority: Focus on state tax collection and compliance
• Local procedures: Varying procedures and settlement authority by state
• Limited programs: Fewer formal resolution programs than federal IRS
• Political pressure: Subject to state political and budgetary pressures

Coordination Opportunities: Understanding these differences allows strategic professionals to:

• Leverage agency priorities for optimal resolution timing
• Prevent agency conflicts that could worsen overall outcomes
• Coordinate settlements that satisfy all agencies simultaneously
• Maximize concessions by understanding each agency’s flexibility

---

The Former Agent Advantage in Multi-Agency Cases

Insider Knowledge That Spans Jurisdictions

My experience as an IRS Revenue Agent provides unique advantages when dealing with multi-agency tax problems:

Federal Agency Expertise:

• IRS procedures: Complete understanding of federal collection and resolution procedures
• Agent psychology: Knowledge of what motivates federal tax personnel
• Settlement authority: Understanding of who has power to approve different outcomes
• Timing strategies: Optimal timing for federal negotiations and submissions

Multi-Agency Coordination:

• Information sharing: Understanding how agencies communicate and coordinate
• Conflict resolution: Managing competing demands from different agencies
• Strategic sequencing: Optimal order for resolving multi-agency problems
• Professional relationships: Contacts across multiple agency levels and jurisdictions

Practical Applications: This insider knowledge translates into tangible benefits:

• Preventing agency conflicts that could worsen your situation
• Coordinating settlements that satisfy all agencies simultaneously
• Leveraging timing for maximum negotiation effectiveness
• Accessing decision-makers across multiple agencies efficiently

Professional Credibility Across Agencies

Former federal agent status provides immediate credibility with both federal and state agencies:

Federal Recognition:

• Professional courtesy from current IRS personnel
• Expedited processing of requests and applications
• Direct access to supervisors and specialists
• Settlement facilitation through professional relationships

State Agency Respect:

• Federal experience creates assumption of competence and professionalism
• Technical knowledge that state agents recognize and respect
• Efficient communication that speeds case processing
• Professional networking that facilitates problem resolution

Coordination Benefits:

• Unified representation across all agencies involved
• Consistent strategy that doesn’t conflict between jurisdictions
• Professional communication that prevents misunderstandings
• Efficient resolution that addresses all problems simultaneously

---

Comprehensive Multi-Agency Resolution Strategies

Coordinated Settlement Planning

Successfully resolving multi-agency tax debt requires sophisticated coordination that addresses all obligations while protecting your financial interests:

Financial Analysis Integration:

• Combined liability assessment: Total exposure across all agencies
• Payment capacity analysis: Realistic evaluation of ability to pay all obligations
• Asset protection planning: Preserving essential assets from multiple collection efforts
• Cash flow coordination: Structuring payments to accommodate business and personal needs

Strategic Sequencing:

• Primary agency identification: Determining which agency to prioritize for settlement
• Timing optimization: Coordinating settlement discussions for maximum leverage
• Information management: Controlling information flow between agencies
• Settlement coordination: Ensuring agreements don’t conflict with each other

Legal Coordination:

• Jurisdiction analysis: Understanding which laws and procedures apply
• Conflict resolution: Managing competing legal requirements
• Agreement integration: Ensuring settlements complement rather than conflict
• Compliance coordination: Meeting ongoing obligations to all agencies

Federal-State Settlement Coordination

The most common multi-agency situation involves coordinating federal IRS and state tax agency resolutions:

Information Sharing Management:

• Automatic reporting: Federal settlements often trigger state reviews
• Voluntary disclosure: Strategic disclosure to state agencies when beneficial
• Confidentiality protection: Preventing information sharing that could worsen state exposure
• Coordination communication: Professional communication between agencies when helpful

Settlement Strategy Coordination:

• Parallel negotiations: Simultaneous discussions with federal and state agencies
• Sequential resolution: Resolving agencies in optimal order for maximum benefit
• Joint settlement proposals: Coordinated proposals that address all obligations
• Cross-agency leverage: Using progress with one agency to facilitate settlement with others

Financial Coordination:

• Payment allocation: Distributing available funds optimally across agencies
• Cash flow management: Ensuring payment plans are sustainable across all obligations
• Asset protection: Preserving essential assets from competing collection efforts
• Future planning: Ensuring ongoing compliance with all agencies

Business Continuation During Multi-Agency Collection

When multiple agencies threaten business operations, sophisticated strategies are required to preserve viability while resolving tax obligations:

Operational Protection:

• Cash flow preservation: Protecting essential business accounts and operations
• Asset coordination: Preventing agency conflicts over business assets
• Employee protection: Ensuring payroll can continue during resolution
• Customer confidence: Maintaining business relationships during tax resolution

Collection Suspension:

• Multi-agency negotiation: Coordinating collection suspension across agencies
• Hardship documentation: Demonstrating that collection would destroy business viability
• Alternative proposals: Offering resolution strategies that benefit all agencies
• Timeline management: Coordinating resolution timelines across agencies

Strategic Business Planning:

• Restructuring options: Business changes that facilitate tax resolution
• Compliance enhancement: Systems to prevent future multi-agency problems
• Financial management: Integration of tax obligations with business planning
• Growth strategies: Positioning business for success post-resolution

---

Case Studies: Multi-Agency Success Stories

Case Study 1: The Restaurant Rescue Operation

Background: Jennifer owned three successful restaurants but fell behind on payroll taxes during the pandemic. Federal IRS demanded $127,000, state agencies wanted $43,000, and both had frozen her business accounts simultaneously.

The Multi-Agency Crisis:

• Federal exposure: $127,000 in payroll taxes, penalties, and interest
• State exposure: $43,000 in sales taxes and employment taxes
• Collection actions: Both agencies froze business accounts on same day
• Business threat: 23 employees, weekly payroll of $28,000, immediate closure threatened
• Asset competition: Agencies competing for limited business assets

Coordinated Resolution Strategy:

• Immediate intervention: Contacted both agencies within 24 hours to request collection suspension
• Business continuation plan: Documented critical nature of business operations and employee impact
• Unified financial presentation: Comprehensive analysis showing business viability with reasonable settlement
• Settlement coordination: Negotiated with both agencies simultaneously to prevent conflicts

Implementation Process:

• Emergency measures: Secured release of frozen accounts within 48 hours for payroll
• Documentation development: Comprehensive financial packages for both agencies
• Parallel negotiations: Simultaneous settlement discussions with federal and state personnel
• Agreement coordination: Structured settlements that complemented rather than competed

Final Resolution:

• Federal settlement: $127,000 debt resolved through OIC for $18,000
• State settlement: $43,000 debt settled for $8,500 through hardship program
• Total savings: $143,500 saved from original $170,000 combined exposure
• Business preserved: All employees retained, operations continued throughout process
• Compliance systems: Enhanced tax management to prevent future problems

Key Success Factors:

1. Immediate professional intervention before business closure
2. Coordinated approach preventing agency conflicts and competition
3. Business viability emphasis showing value of settlement vs. closure
4. Strategic timing of negotiations for maximum agency receptiveness

Case Study 2: The Medical Practice Multi-State Challenge

Background: Dr. Michael operated medical practices in three states, each with different tax obligations and collection actions pending across federal and multiple state jurisdictions.

The Complex Situation:

• Federal IRS: $285,000 in income and employment taxes across multiple entities
• California: $67,000 in state income and payroll taxes
• Nevada: $34,000 in business license fees and taxes
• Arizona: $28,000 in professional licensing and tax obligations
• Total exposure: $414,000 across four different tax agencies

Coordination Challenges:

• Different procedures: Each agency operated under different rules and timelines
• Conflicting demands: Payment requirements that exceeded combined practice income
• Information sharing: Agencies sharing information that complicated settlement discussions
• Asset competition: Multiple agencies pursuing same assets and income sources
• Professional licenses: State licensing boards threatening practice closure

Strategic Resolution Approach:

• Jurisdiction analysis: Comprehensive review of laws and procedures in each state
• Priority assessment: Determining which agencies posed greatest immediate threats
• Coordinated communication: Professional relationship management across all agencies
• Settlement sequencing: Optimal order for resolution to maximize leverage and outcomes

Implementation Success:

• Federal resolution: $285,000 settled through OIC for $52,000
• California settlement: $67,000 reduced to $15,000 through hardship determination
• Nevada resolution: $34,000 reduced to $8,000 through compliance agreement
• Arizona settlement: $28,000 eliminated entirely through procedural violations
• Total outcome: $414,000 exposure resolved for $75,000 (82% reduction)

Long-Term Results:

• Practice preservation: All three practice locations continued operations
• License protection: Professional licenses maintained in all states
• Compliance systems: Unified tax management across all jurisdictions
• Growth achievement: Practices expanded successfully post-resolution

Key Success Factors:

1. Multi-state expertise navigating different legal frameworks
2. Professional relationships across multiple agencies and jurisdictions
3. Coordinated strategy preventing agency conflicts and maximizing leverage
4. Long-term planning ensuring sustainable compliance across all jurisdictions

Case Study 3: The Technology Company Restructure

Background: A growing technology company faced simultaneous federal and state audits that resulted in massive assessments across multiple jurisdictions and tax types.

The Assessment Crisis:

• Federal income tax: $180,000 additional assessment from R&D credit audit
• Federal payroll tax: $95,000 from worker classification issues
• California income tax: $67,000 from federal audit adjustments
• California sales tax: $43,000 from software licensing audit
• Local business tax: $12,000 from business license and fee issues
• Combined exposure: $397,000 threatening company viability

Multi-Faceted Challenges:

• Technical complexity: Sophisticated tax issues requiring specialized knowledge
• Agency coordination: Multiple agencies sharing information and coordinating efforts
• Business impact: Assessments exceeded annual company profits
• Growth implications: Uncertainty preventing business expansion and investment
• Employee concerns: Staff worried about company stability and job security

Comprehensive Resolution Strategy:

• Technical defense: Expert analysis challenging basis for each agency’s assessments
• Coordinated appeals: Simultaneous appeal processes across all agencies
• Settlement preparation: Financial analysis supporting compromise positions
• Business protection: Strategies to preserve operations during resolution process

Resolution Achievements:

• Federal income tax: Reduced from $180,000 to $32,000 through appeals
• Federal payroll tax: Eliminated entirely through worker classification defense
• California income tax: Reduced from $67,000 to $15,000 through conformity adjustment
• California sales tax: Settled for $12,000 through voluntary disclosure benefits
• Local business tax: Eliminated through procedural violation challenges
• Total resolution: $397,000 exposure resolved for $59,000 (85% reduction)

Business Transformation:

• Operational improvement: Enhanced compliance systems across all jurisdictions
• Growth acceleration: Company doubled in size within two years post-resolution
• Professional systems: Sophisticated tax planning and compliance infrastructure
• Market confidence: Successful resolution enhanced company credibility and valuation

Key Success Factors:

1. Technical expertise across multiple tax specialties and jurisdictions
2. Coordinated defense challenging assessments systematically across agencies
3. Business focus on preserving and enhancing operations during resolution
4. Professional transformation implementing systems preventing future problems

---

Advanced Multi-Agency Coordination Techniques

Information Flow Management

One of the most critical aspects of multi-agency cases is controlling information flow between agencies:

Strategic Information Control:

• Disclosure timing: Releasing information to agencies at optimal times
• Coordination prevention: Preventing agencies from coordinating against taxpayer interests
• Confidentiality protection: Using legal privileges to protect sensitive information
• Strategic transparency: Providing information that facilitates favorable resolution

Inter-Agency Communication:

• Professional coordination: Managing communication between agencies when beneficial
• Conflict prevention: Preventing agencies from working against each other
• Settlement facilitation: Using agency relationships to facilitate resolution
• Problem resolution: Efficiently resolving procedural conflicts between agencies

Settlement Sequencing Strategies

The order in which agencies are approached for settlement can dramatically affect outcomes:

Priority Analysis:

• Threat assessment: Which agencies pose immediate danger to assets or operations
• Settlement potential: Which agencies are most likely to accept reasonable settlements
• Information implications: How settlement with one agency affects others
• Strategic leverage: Using early settlements to facilitate later ones

Timing Coordination:

• Simultaneous negotiations: When parallel discussions are most effective
• Sequential resolution: Optimal order for addressing agencies individually
• Pressure utilization: Using deadlines and agency priorities for maximum leverage
• Momentum building: Creating positive momentum that facilitates subsequent settlements

Asset Protection in Multi-Agency Cases

Protecting essential assets from multiple collection efforts requires sophisticated planning:

Coordination Strategies:

• Asset identification: Cataloging all assets that might be targeted by agencies
• Protection prioritization: Determining which assets are most critical to preserve
• Legal strategies: Using legal protections to shield essential assets
• Negotiation leverage: Using asset protection as part of settlement negotiations

Multi-Jurisdiction Considerations:

• State law variations: Different asset protection laws across jurisdictions
• Federal supremacy: When federal collection powers override state protections
• Exemption optimization: Maximizing legal exemptions across all jurisdictions
• Strategic positioning: Positioning assets for maximum protection during resolution

---

Specialized Multi-Agency Resolution Programs

Federal-State Voluntary Disclosure Programs

Many states offer voluntary disclosure programs that can be coordinated with federal resolution efforts:

Program Benefits:

• Penalty reduction: Significant penalty relief for voluntary disclosure
• Limited lookback: Restrictions on how many years can be assessed
• Settlement opportunities: Enhanced settlement authority for voluntary disclosures
• Compliance facilitation: Streamlined procedures for achieving compliance

Coordination Strategies:

• Timing optimization: Coordinating federal and state voluntary disclosures
• Information management: Controlling information flow between agencies
• Settlement integration: Ensuring federal and state settlements complement each other
• Compliance coordination: Meeting all ongoing obligations across jurisdictions

Multi-State Compact Coordination

Some tax issues involve multi-state compacts and agreements that create coordination opportunities:

Interstate Coordination:

• Information sharing agreements: How states share tax information
• Collection cooperation: When states cooperate in collection efforts
• Settlement coordination: Opportunities for multi-state settlement discussions
• Compliance integration: Unified compliance across multiple states

Strategic Applications:

• Leverage creation: Using interstate relationships for settlement leverage
• Efficiency gains: Coordinating resolution across multiple states simultaneously
• Cost reduction: Reducing overall resolution costs through coordination
• Compliance simplification: Streamlining ongoing obligations across states

---

Technology and Systems for Multi-Agency Compliance

Integrated Compliance Management

Successful multi-agency resolution requires implementing systems that prevent future problems:

Technology Solutions:

• Multi-jurisdiction tracking: Systems monitoring obligations across all agencies
• Automated compliance: Technology ensuring timely filing and payment
• Integration capabilities: Coordination between federal and state tax systems
• Alert systems: Early warning of potential compliance issues

Professional Integration:

• Coordinated representation: Professional relationships across all relevant jurisdictions
• Unified strategy: Consistent approach to tax planning and compliance
• Ongoing monitoring: Regular review of obligations and opportunities
• Proactive planning: Preventing problems before they develop

Long-Term Success Planning

Multi-agency tax resolution should be integrated with comprehensive long-term planning:

Business Planning Integration:

• Multi-state strategy: Business planning that considers tax implications across jurisdictions
• Compliance optimization: Structuring operations for efficient tax compliance
• Growth planning: Scaling businesses while maintaining multi-agency compliance
• Risk management: Identifying and mitigating multi-agency tax risks

Personal Financial Planning:

• Multi-state considerations: Personal financial planning across multiple jurisdictions
• Tax efficiency: Optimizing personal tax situations across agencies
• Asset protection: Long-term strategies for protecting assets from multiple agencies
• Succession planning: Estate and gift planning considering multi-agency implications

---

The Complete Multi-Agency Resolution Process

Phase 1: Crisis Assessment and Stabilization

When facing multi-agency collection actions, immediate professional intervention is crucial:

Emergency Response (First 24-48 Hours):

1. Immediate contact with all agencies to request collection suspension
2. Asset protection measures to prevent irreversible damage
3. Information gathering about all agencies and collection actions
4. Professional representation establishment across all jurisdictions
5. Crisis communication with employees, customers, and stakeholders

Stabilization Process (First 2 Weeks):

• Comprehensive assessment of all tax obligations across agencies
• Financial analysis showing impact of coordinated collection efforts
• Strategic planning for coordinated resolution approach
• Professional relationship establishment with key agency personnel
• Timeline development for comprehensive resolution process

Phase 2: Coordinated Resolution Development

With immediate crisis stabilized, comprehensive resolution planning begins:

Strategic Planning (Weeks 3-8):

• Agency coordination assessment and conflict identification
• Resolution option analysis across all agencies and jurisdictions
• Financial planning for sustainable resolution across all obligations
• Legal strategy development addressing all applicable laws and procedures
• Implementation timeline with milestones and success metrics

Documentation Development (Weeks 6-12):

• Unified financial presentations across all agencies
• Coordinated legal arguments supporting resolution positions
• Strategic communication plans for each agency relationship
• Settlement proposals that address all agencies comprehensively
• Implementation procedures for successful resolution execution

Phase 3: Implementation and Success

Professional execution of coordinated resolution strategy:

Active Resolution (Months 3-12):

• Simultaneous negotiations with all relevant agencies
• Information coordination preventing agency conflicts
• Settlement achievement across all jurisdictions involved
• Implementation management ensuring all agreements are fulfilled
• Compliance establishment preventing future multi-agency problems

Long-Term Success (Ongoing):

• Monitoring systems tracking obligations across all agencies
• Professional relationships maintenance for future needs
• Compliance optimization ensuring efficient ongoing obligations
• Strategic planning integration with business and personal goals
• Problem prevention through proactive professional management

---

Take Control of Your Multi-Agency Tax Future

Multi-agency tax debt doesn’t have to destroy your financial future or business operations. While these complex situations require sophisticated strategies and coordinated professional intervention, they can be resolved successfully when you have the right knowledge, approach, and representation.

The key principles for multi-agency tax resolution success:

• Early intervention prevents agency coordination against your interests
• Professional coordination ensures unified strategy across all agencies
• Insider knowledge of agency operations provides strategic advantages
• Strategic sequencing maximizes leverage and resolution outcomes
• Comprehensive planning addresses all obligations while protecting essential assets
• Long-term focus prevents future multi-agency problems through proper systems

As a former IRS Revenue Agent with extensive multi-agency resolution experience, I bring unique advantages to every complex tax situation:

Proven Multi-Agency Results:

• 95% success rate in preventing business closure during multi-agency collection
• Average 78% debt reduction in successfully resolved multi-agency cases
• 4.8 month average resolution time vs. 18+ months industry average
• Zero compliance failures in post-resolution monitoring over 5+ years

Unique Professional Advantages:

• Former federal agent credibility respected by agencies across all jurisdictions
• Multi-agency coordination expertise preventing conflicts and maximizing leverage
• Comprehensive resolution planning addressing all obligations simultaneously
• Long-term success focus ensuring sustainable resolution and future protection

Don’t let multi-agency tax problems overwhelm your financial future. Every day of delay allows agencies to coordinate their efforts more effectively against your interests, while early professional intervention can often prevent the worst outcomes and achieve results that seemed impossible.

Your complex tax situation requires sophisticated professional representation that understands how to navigate multiple agencies, coordinate competing demands, and achieve comprehensive resolution that protects your assets while resolving all obligations.

Contact William McConnaughy, CPA today:

📞 Phone: 916-979-7690
📧 Email: info@backtaxeshelp.pro
🌐 Website: https://backtaxeshelp.pro
📝 Online Consultation: https://backtaxeshelp.pro/contact-us/

Call 916-979-7690 today for your confidential multi-agency tax resolution consultation and discover how coordinated professional intervention can transform your tax nightmare into a comprehensive resolution that protects your financial future.

Remember: Multi-agency tax problems require multi-agency solutions. Don’t face coordinated government collection efforts alone when professional representation can level the playing field and achieve results that preserve your assets, protect your business, and secure your financial future.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How do I know if I have multi-agency tax problems? A: You have multi-agency issues if you owe taxes to both federal and state agencies, have businesses in multiple states, or face collection from different types of taxes (income, sales, payroll, etc.). The key warning sign is receiving notices from multiple tax agencies.

Q: Can agencies really coordinate their collection efforts against me? A: Yes, agencies routinely share information and can coordinate collection actions. When this happens without professional intervention, it often creates overwhelming financial pressure that can destroy businesses and personal financial security.

Q: Is it more expensive to resolve multi-agency tax problems? A: While multi-agency cases require more sophisticated representation, the cost is typically far less than the combined damages from uncoordinated collection efforts. Professional coordination often saves 5-10 times its cost through better settlement terms and preserved assets.

Q: How long do multi-agency resolutions typically take? A: Timeline varies by complexity, but coordinated professional resolution typically takes 4-12 months vs. 18+ months when agencies are addressed separately. The key is preventing agencies from working against each other during the process.

Q: What happens if one agency settles but another doesn’t? A: This is why coordinated strategy is crucial. Professional representation ensures that settlement with one agency doesn’t inadvertently worsen your position with others, and often creates leverage that facilitates settlement with remaining agencies.

Q: Can I use bankruptcy to resolve multi-agency tax debt? A: Bankruptcy can be effective for certain types of tax debt, but it requires careful coordination across jurisdictions since federal and state agencies may have different priorities in bankruptcy proceedings. Professional analysis is essential for determining if bankruptcy is optimal for your situation.

---

William McConnaughy, CPA, MS Taxation – Former IRS Revenue Agent
Licensed in California | Enrolled to Practice Before the IRS
Serving clients nationwide with federal and state tax resolution services