Real IRS Tax Resolution Success Stories and Case Studies

Expert guidance from William McConnaughy, CPA – Former IRS Revenue Agent

---

“Mr. McConnaughy, I need to tell you something. When I first called you, I was three days away from losing my house. The IRS was going to seize it to pay my $385,000 tax debt, and I had nowhere else to turn. Everyone told me there was nothing that could be done.”

Sarah paused, her voice catching with emotion. “Today I got the letter. The IRS accepted our Offer in Compromise for $18,000. You saved my home, my business, and probably my life. I still can’t believe it’s real.”

This is why I do what I do. Behind every tax case are real people facing real consequences—homes at risk, businesses failing, families torn apart by financial stress, and dreams shattered by overwhelming tax debts. But here’s what I’ve learned from representing hundreds of taxpayers over the past decade: no matter how hopeless a situation appears, there’s almost always a path to resolution when you know how to navigate the system.

The stories you’re about to read aren’t marketing fiction—they’re real cases from my practice, with names and identifying details changed to protect client privacy. These cases represent the full spectrum of tax problems I’ve resolved, from relatively simple penalty abatements to complex multi-million dollar settlements that seemed impossible to achieve.

Each story illustrates specific strategies, demonstrates why certain approaches worked, and shows the tangible impact that proper representation can have on real people’s lives. More importantly, these cases demonstrate that the IRS resolution programs actually work when they’re applied correctly by someone who understands the system from the inside.

Whether you’re facing a situation similar to one of these cases, or dealing with something completely different, these stories will show you what’s possible when you approach tax problems strategically rather than hoping they’ll simply go away.

---

Case Study 1: The Small Business Survival Story

Background: When Payroll Taxes Nearly Destroyed a Family Business

Client Profile:

• Business: Family-owned restaurant, 15 employees
• Problem: $180,000 in unpaid payroll taxes over 18 months
• Threat: Business closure, personal liability for owners
• Timeline: 6 months to resolution

The Crisis: Maria and Carlos Rodriguez had owned their restaurant for eight years, building it from a small neighborhood eatery into a thriving business that employed 15 people and supported two families. But when the economy slowed and customer traffic dropped, they faced an impossible choice: lay off employees or use payroll tax money to keep the doors open.

“We kept thinking business would pick back up,” Maria explained. “We never meant to get behind on the payroll taxes, but every month we had to choose between paying the IRS or paying our employees. We chose our employees.”

The IRS Response: By the time they contacted me, the situation had escalated dramatically:

• The IRS had assessed $180,000 in payroll taxes, penalties, and interest
• Trust Fund Recovery Penalties were being pursued against both owners personally
• A Revenue Officer was threatening immediate business closure
• The restaurant’s bank accounts had been levied twice
• Employees were worried about job security and the future of the business

The Challenge: This case presented multiple complex challenges:

• Personal Liability: Both owners faced personal liability for trust fund taxes through the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty
• Business Continuation: The restaurant needed to continue operating to have any chance of paying the debt
• Cash Flow: The business was barely breaking even and couldn’t afford large payments
• Employee Morale: Staff needed assurance that their jobs were secure
• Time Pressure: The Revenue Officer was moving toward forced closure

Strategic Analysis and Approach

Financial Assessment: My first step was conducting a comprehensive analysis of both the business and personal financial situations:

Business Analysis:

• Revenue had declined 30% from pre-pandemic levels but was stabilizing
• The restaurant was operationally profitable but couldn’t service the tax debt
• Essential business assets (equipment, inventory) were worth about $85,000
• The business employed 15 people with annual payroll of $480,000

Personal Analysis:

• Owners had limited personal assets beyond their home (equity of $40,000)
• Both owners worked full-time in the business with modest salaries
• No significant sources of income outside the business
• Personal living expenses were reasonable and well-documented

Trust Fund Recovery Penalty Analysis: I needed to determine which owner had actual responsibility for payroll tax decisions:

• Carlos handled day-to-day operations and employee management
• Maria managed finances and made payment decisions
• Both were signers on bank accounts, but Maria had primary financial control
• During the critical period, Maria made the decisions about which creditors to pay

Resolution Strategy Implementation

Phase 1: Immediate Stabilization Business Protection:

• Negotiated immediate suspension of levy actions to prevent business closure
• Established current payroll tax compliance to demonstrate good faith
• Implemented weekly reporting to Revenue Officer showing compliance efforts
• Secured agreement that business could continue operating during negotiations

Trust Fund Recovery Penalty Defense:

• Prepared comprehensive defense for Carlos showing limited financial authority
• Documented Maria’s primary responsibility for payment decisions during critical period
• Negotiated concentration of personal liability on Maria alone
• Protected Carlos from personal liability, preserving family income

Phase 2: Settlement Negotiation Offer in Compromise Preparation:

• Calculated business reasonable collection potential at $65,000
• Prepared detailed financial analysis showing inability to pay full amount
• Documented special circumstances affecting business viability
• Coordinated business and personal OIC applications

Strategic Presentation:

• Emphasized business’s role as employer and community asset
• Demonstrated genuine attempts to resolve tax obligations
• Showed current compliance and future viability
• Presented settlement as better alternative than business closure

Phase 3: Implementation and Compliance Settlement Terms:

• Business OIC accepted for $45,000 (75% reduction)
• Personal OIC for Maria accepted for $15,000
• Combined settlement: $60,000 vs. original $180,000 debt
• Payment terms: $2,500/month for 24 months

Ongoing Compliance:

• Implemented automated payroll tax deposit system
• Established monthly monitoring and reporting procedures
• Created cash flow management system for tax obligations
• Developed emergency procedures for future cash flow problems

Results and Impact

Financial Results:

• Total Debt Reduction: $120,000 (67% savings)
• Monthly Payment: $2,500 vs. $7,500 the IRS initially demanded
• Business Preserved: Restaurant continued operations throughout resolution
• Jobs Saved: All 15 employees retained employment

Personal Impact:

• Home Protected: Family home never at risk due to successful TFRP defense
• Credit Preserved: No personal liens filed against owners
• Stress Relief: Family able to focus on business growth rather than survival
• Future Security: Business now profitable with proper tax management

Long-Term Success: Three years later:

• Restaurant has expanded to 22 employees
• All settlement payments made on time
• Perfect compliance with ongoing tax obligations
• Business revenue increased 25% above pre-problem levels

Key Success Factors:

1. Immediate Action: Stabilizing the situation before business closure
2. Strategic Defense: Protecting one spouse from personal liability
3. Comprehensive Analysis: Understanding both business and personal finances
4. Professional Presentation: Demonstrating business viability and compliance efforts
5. Implementation Support: Systems to ensure ongoing compliance and success

Client Testimonial: “William saved our business and our family. We went from facing bankruptcy and losing everything to having a thriving restaurant again. But more than that, he gave us the knowledge and systems to never let this happen again. We sleep better at night knowing we understand our obligations and have someone we can call if problems arise.” – Maria Rodriguez

---

Case Study 2: The Executive’s International Tax Nightmare

Background: When Offshore Accounts Create Million-Dollar Problems

Client Profile:

• Occupation: Corporate executive with international assignments
• Problem: $2.3 million in taxes and FBAR penalties from unreported foreign accounts
• Threat: Criminal prosecution, career destruction, financial ruin
• Timeline: 18 months to resolution

The Discovery: James Patterson was a successful corporate executive who had worked internationally for over a decade. During overseas assignments in Singapore and London, he had accumulated foreign bank accounts and investments that he failed to report on his U.S. tax returns.

“I honestly didn’t know I had to report foreign accounts to the IRS,” James explained. “My company’s tax department handled my expatriate returns, and I assumed they took care of everything. When I found out about the reporting requirements, I had 12 years of unreported accounts and over $1.8 million in accumulated income.”

The IRS Discovery: The problem came to light when the IRS received information from foreign banks under new information exchange agreements:

• Unreported Foreign Income: $1.8 million over 12 years
• Additional Income Taxes: $680,000 plus interest
• FBAR Penalties: $1.6 million (willful penalties on account balances)
• Form 8938 Penalties: $60,000 for failure to file international information returns
• Total Exposure: $2.34 million plus potential criminal charges

The Criminal Threat: The case was initially handled by IRS Criminal Investigation Division because:

• Multiple years of non-reporting suggested willful conduct
• High dollar amounts triggered automatic criminal review
• Sophisticated taxpayer expected to know reporting requirements
• Pattern of non-compliance appeared intentional

Strategic Analysis and Criminal Defense

Criminal Exposure Assessment: Working with criminal tax counsel, we analyzed the potential for prosecution:

Factors Supporting Willfulness:

• Sophisticated taxpayer with advanced education
• Corporate executive expected to understand tax obligations
• Multiple years of non-reporting
• High dollar amounts involved

Factors Supporting Non-Willfulness:

• Company tax department handled expatriate returns
• No evidence of intentional concealment
• Immediate disclosure when requirements discovered
• No lifestyle inconsistent with reported income

Civil vs. Criminal Strategy: We developed a coordinated approach:

• Criminal Defense: Focus on lack of willful intent
• Civil Resolution: Demonstrate good faith through voluntary disclosure
• Coordination: Ensure civil actions supported criminal defense

Resolution Strategy Implementation

Phase 1: Voluntary Disclosure Modified Streamlined Procedure Application:

• Filed under non-willful streamlined procedures
• Paid all back taxes, interest, and reduced penalties
• Amended returns for all unreported years
• Comprehensive financial disclosure and certification

Criminal Investigation Coordination:

• Provided detailed explanation of circumstances to CI
• Documented reliance on corporate tax department
• Demonstrated immediate compliance when requirements discovered
• Showed pattern of good faith throughout process

Phase 2: Penalty Mitigation FBAR Penalty Challenge:

• Argued for non-willful penalty treatment (maximum $12,459 per year vs. $1.6 million)
• Documented reasonable cause for non-reporting
• Provided evidence of good faith reliance on professionals
• Demonstrated immediate compliance when requirements understood

Reasonable Cause Arguments:

• Complexity of international tax requirements
• Reliance on corporate tax professionals
• Lack of guidance or education on reporting requirements
• Immediate corrective action when discovered

Phase 3: Settlement Negotiation Comprehensive Settlement Proposal:

• Payment of all taxes and interest: $780,000
• Non-willful FBAR penalties: $75,000 (reduced from $1.6 million)
• Form 8938 penalty elimination through reasonable cause
• Total settlement: $855,000 vs. $2.34 million exposure

Criminal Resolution:

• Criminal Investigation concluded no prosecution warranted
• Civil resolution demonstrated good faith and cooperation
• No criminal charges filed
• Case closed with civil settlement only

Results and Impact

Financial Results:

• Total Savings: $1.485 million (63% reduction)
• Criminal Exposure: Eliminated entirely
• Career Protection: No criminal charges preserved professional reputation
• Future Compliance: Comprehensive systems implemented

Personal Impact:

• Career Preserved: Continued executive position without criminal issues
• Family Security: Protected family from financial devastation
• Stress Relief: Eliminated constant fear of prosecution
• Reputation Protected: No public criminal proceedings

Compliance Implementation:

• Professional Tax Preparation: Specialized international tax professional retained
• Annual Reviews: Comprehensive review of all international requirements
• Education: Ongoing training on international tax obligations
• Documentation: Systems to track all foreign financial accounts

Key Success Factors:

1. Early Intervention: Addressing criminal exposure before charges filed
2. Strategic Disclosure: Using voluntary disclosure to demonstrate good faith
3. Professional Coordination: Working with both civil and criminal counsel
4. Evidence Development: Documenting reasonable cause and good faith
5. Comprehensive Resolution: Addressing all civil and criminal exposure

Client Testimonial: “When I discovered my international tax problems, I thought my career was over. The potential for criminal charges and millions in penalties was terrifying. William’s coordination with criminal counsel and deep understanding of international tax issues saved not just my finances, but my entire future. His strategic approach turned what could have been a career-ending disaster into a manageable resolution that let me move forward with confidence.” – James Patterson

---

Case Study 3: The Medical Emergency Penalty Relief

Background: When Life-Threatening Illness Creates Tax Problems

Client Profile:

• Occupation: Small business owner (medical device sales)
• Problem: $125,000 in penalties from missed filings during medical emergency
• Threat: Business failure, personal financial destruction
• Timeline: 8 months to resolution

The Medical Crisis: Dr. Sarah Chen ran a successful medical device sales business as a sole proprietorship. In March 2019, she was diagnosed with aggressive breast cancer requiring immediate surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatments that lasted nearly eight months.

“I was fighting for my life,” Sarah explained. “For six months, I was either in the hospital, recovering from surgery, or so sick from chemo that I could barely function. Tax filing was the last thing on my mind—I was just trying to survive.”

The Tax Consequences: During her illness and recovery, several critical tax deadlines were missed:

• 2019 Individual Return: Filed 8 months late due to illness
• 2019 Quarterly Estimated Payments: Three quarters missed entirely
• 2020 Q1 Estimated Payment: Missed due to ongoing treatment
• Employment Tax Returns: Two quarters filed late for part-time assistant

The Penalty Assessment: The IRS assessed substantial penalties for the missed deadlines:

• Failure to File Penalty: $35,000 (5% per month on 2019 return)
• Failure to Pay Penalty: $18,000 (0.5% per month on unpaid taxes)
• Estimated Tax Penalty: $28,000 (underpayment penalty for missed quarters)
• Employment Tax Penalties: $44,000 (failure to file and deposit penalties)
• Total Penalties: $125,000 on original tax liability of $180,000

Strategic Analysis and Documentation

Medical Documentation Review: I worked with Sarah to gather comprehensive medical documentation:

Treatment Timeline:

• March 2019: Initial diagnosis and emergency surgery
• April-September 2019: Chemotherapy treatment every three weeks
• October-December 2019: Daily radiation treatments
• January-April 2020: Recovery and follow-up treatments

Incapacity Documentation:

• Hospital records showing dates of admission and treatment
• Oncologist statements regarding treatment side effects and incapacity
• Medication records showing cognitive-impairing treatments
• Treatment calendar showing overlap with tax deadlines

Business Impact Analysis:

• Business operations essentially suspended during treatment
• No employees or business partners to handle tax obligations
• Limited family support available for business matters
• Part-time assistant hired only for essential customer service

Penalty Abatement Strategy

Legal Framework Analysis: I researched the specific requirements for medical reasonable cause:

Reasonable Cause Standard:

• Taxpayer exercised ordinary business care and prudence
• Circumstances beyond taxpayer’s control prevented compliance
• Immediate compliance when able to do so
• Good faith effort to meet obligations

Medical Reasonable Cause Criteria:

• Serious illness that prevented compliance
• Timing relationship between illness and missed deadlines
• Extent of incapacity during critical periods
• Actions taken once recovery allowed

Strategic Documentation Package:

• Comprehensive medical timeline with treatment dates
• Physician statements regarding incapacity during tax periods
• Business records showing suspended operations
• Evidence of immediate compliance once recovery permitted

Implementation and IRS Response

Phase 1: Comprehensive Penalty Abatement Request Initial Submission:

• Detailed reasonable cause letter explaining medical circumstances
• Complete medical documentation package
• Timeline showing relationship between illness and missed deadlines
• Evidence of immediate compliance when physically able

IRS Initial Response:

• Request for additional medical documentation
• Questions about business operations during illness
• Verification of treatment dates and incapacity periods
• Review of compliance efforts post-recovery

Phase 2: Additional Documentation and Appeals Supplemental Submission:

• Additional physician statements regarding specific incapacity periods
• Treatment records showing cognitive effects of chemotherapy
• Business records proving operational suspension
• Client testimony regarding impact of illness on daily functioning

Appeals Process:

• Initial request partially approved (60% of penalties abated)
• Appealed remaining penalties with additional documentation
• Supervisor review requested for medical reasonable cause
• Final determination pending additional evidence

Phase 3: Complete Resolution Final Documentation:

• Comprehensive physician narrative detailing incapacity
• Medical literature on chemotherapy cognitive effects
• Timeline correlation between treatment and missed deadlines
• Evidence of perfect compliance post-recovery

IRS Final Decision:

• Complete abatement of all penalties granted
• Recognition of extraordinary medical circumstances
• Acknowledgment of reasonable cause throughout penalty period
• Commendation for eventual compliance efforts

Results and Impact

Financial Results:

• Total Penalty Elimination: $125,000 (100% abatement)
• Time to Resolution: 8 months from initial request
• Business Preservation: Company continued operations post-recovery
• Credit Protection: No liens or collection actions during process

Personal Impact:

• Financial Relief: Eliminated overwhelming penalty burden during recovery
• Stress Reduction: Allowed focus on health rather than tax problems
• Business Recovery: Enabled gradual return to full business operations
• Future Security: Established precedent for medical reasonable cause

Health and Recovery:

• Client achieved full remission from cancer
• Gradually returned to full business operations
• Implemented systems to prevent future compliance issues
• Maintained perfect tax compliance post-recovery

Key Success Factors:

1. Comprehensive Medical Documentation: Detailed evidence of incapacity
2. Timeline Correlation: Clear relationship between illness and non-compliance
3. Immediate Compliance: Perfect compliance once recovery permitted
4. Professional Presentation: Organized, persuasive reasonable cause arguments
5. Persistence: Continuing appeals process until complete resolution achieved

Client Testimonial: “Fighting cancer was the hardest thing I’ve ever done, but the IRS penalties made recovery even more stressful. I felt like I was being punished for getting sick. William understood that this wasn’t about making excuses—it was about recognizing that life-threatening illness creates circumstances beyond anyone’s control. His compassionate but professional approach got every penny of those penalties eliminated, and I was able to focus on rebuilding my health and my business.” – Dr. Sarah Chen

---

Case Study 4: The Retirement Account Levy Emergency

Background: When the IRS Threatens Your Future Security

Client Profile:

• Occupation: Recently retired teacher, age 67
• Problem: IRS levy on 401(k) account for $95,000 tax debt
• Threat: Loss of retirement savings, financial devastation in old age
• Timeline: 3 weeks to resolution

The Retirement Crisis: Margaret Thompson had taught elementary school for 35 years and retired at age 65 with a modest but adequate 401(k) account balance of $280,000. Two years into retirement, she received a notice that the IRS was levying her entire retirement account to satisfy a tax debt from her late husband’s business.

“I had no idea Robert’s business owed taxes,” Margaret explained. “We filed joint returns, so I thought everything was fine. When he passed away three years ago, I was grieving and overwhelmed. I never imagined the IRS would try to take my entire retirement savings.”

The Hidden Tax Problem: The tax debt originated from Margaret’s deceased husband’s consulting business:

• Unreported Business Income: $185,000 over three years
• Self-Employment Taxes: $26,000 owed
• Income Taxes: $49,000 owed
• Penalties and Interest: $20,000 accumulated
• Total Debt: $95,000 on joint returns

The Levy Crisis: The situation became critical when:

• IRS issued Notice of Intent to Levy on 401(k) account
• 30-day deadline to respond was missed due to address change
• Levy was executed, freezing entire $280,000 retirement account
• Margaret’s only source of income was eliminated overnight
• Social Security alone was insufficient for basic living expenses

Emergency Response Strategy

Immediate Crisis Management: With Margaret’s retirement account frozen and no other income source, immediate action was required:

Day 1: Emergency Contact

• Contacted Revenue Officer immediately to request levy release
• Documented Margaret’s status as innocent spouse with no business involvement
• Explained financial hardship created by levy on sole retirement income
• Requested immediate temporary release pending full review

Day 2-3: Hardship Documentation

• Gathered evidence of Margaret’s limited involvement in husband’s business
• Documented reliance on retirement account for basic living expenses
• Prepared financial statements showing inability to survive without retirement income
• Obtained medical documentation of health conditions requiring ongoing care

Week 1: Legal Analysis

• Researched innocent spouse relief qualification requirements
• Analyzed Margaret’s knowledge of husband’s business activities
• Documented separate finances and limited business involvement
• Prepared comprehensive innocent spouse relief request

Multi-Strategy Resolution Approach

Strategy 1: Immediate Levy Release Economic Hardship Argument:

• Retirement account was Margaret’s sole source of income beyond Social Security
• Levy created immediate financial crisis for elderly taxpayer
• Basic living expenses could not be met without retirement income
• Medical expenses required ongoing access to retirement funds

Innocent Spouse Protection:

• Margaret had no involvement in husband’s consulting business
• Business was operated independently from household finances
• Margaret was unaware of business income underreporting
• All business decisions and tax obligations were husband’s responsibility

Strategy 2: Innocent Spouse Relief Knowledge Standard Analysis:

• Margaret worked full-time as teacher during years in question
• Husband handled all business matters and tax preparation
• Separate bank accounts for business and personal finances
• No evidence Margaret knew of unreported business income

Benefit Analysis:

• Margaret received no direct benefit from unreported business income
• Standard of living remained consistent with reported income
• No unusual expenditures or lifestyle changes during period
• Business income was retained in separate business accounts

Strategy 3: Collection Alternative Currently Not Collectible Status:

• Margaret’s only income was Social Security and retirement distributions
• Fixed expenses exceeded available income
• Age and health conditions limited earning capacity
• Collection would prevent meeting basic living needs

Implementation and Results

Phase 1: Emergency Levy Release (Week 1) Immediate Relief:

• Revenue Officer agreed to temporary levy release for 90 days
• Access to retirement account restored for basic living expenses
• Formal hardship documentation submitted
• Innocent spouse relief application filed simultaneously

Phase 2: Innocent Spouse Relief Process (Months 2-6) Comprehensive Documentation:

• Complete separation of business and personal finances documented
• Testimony from family and friends regarding Margaret’s lack of business involvement
• Professional analysis of tax returns showing business income segregation
• Medical records supporting Margaret’s focus on teaching career and health issues

IRS Investigation:

• Revenue Agent interviewed Margaret about business knowledge
• Review of bank records confirmed separate financial management
• Business records showed husband’s sole control and responsibility
• No evidence found of Margaret’s awareness of unreported income

Phase 3: Final Resolution (Month 6) Innocent Spouse Relief Granted:

• IRS determined Margaret qualified for complete relief from joint liability
• All taxes, penalties, and interest eliminated from Margaret’s obligation
• Levy permanently released with no future collection actions
• Case closed with no remaining liability

Results and Impact

Financial Results:

• Complete Debt Elimination: $95,000 liability eliminated entirely
• Retirement Security Restored: Full access to $280,000 retirement account
• Future Protection: No ongoing IRS collection concerns
• Peace of Mind: Secure retirement after years of worry

Personal Impact:

• Financial Security: Retirement income restored and protected
• Health Considerations: Ability to afford medical care and medications
• Independence: Continued ability to live independently
• Family Relief: Adult children no longer concerned about mother’s financial security

Long-Term Success:

• Margaret continued to live comfortably on retirement income
• No ongoing tax problems or compliance issues
• Estate planning updated to prevent future issues
• Peace of mind restored for remaining retirement years

Key Success Factors:

1. Emergency Response: Immediate action to address financial crisis
2. Legal Analysis: Proper application of innocent spouse relief provisions
3. Comprehensive Documentation: Clear evidence of separate business responsibility
4. Professional Advocacy: Effective representation with Revenue Officer and examination team
5. Persistence: Continued advocacy through entire innocent spouse process

Client Testimonial: “I thought my life was over when the IRS took my retirement account. At 67 years old, with no other income, I didn’t know how I would survive. William not only got my money back, but he eliminated the entire debt because I truly had nothing to do with my husband’s business problems. He gave me back my security and my dignity. I can’t thank him enough for fighting for an elderly widow who had nowhere else to turn.” – Margaret Thompson

---

Case Study 5: The Multi-Million Dollar Business Settlement

Background: When Success Creates Overwhelming Tax Problems

Client Profile:

• Business: Technology consulting firm, 45 employees
• Problem: $4.8 million tax assessment from transfer pricing audit
• Threat: Business bankruptcy, massive personal guarantees
• Timeline: 2 years to resolution

The Success Story Gone Wrong: TechSolutions Inc. was a highly successful consulting firm specializing in software implementation for large corporations. Founded by twin brothers David and Michael Chen, the company had grown from a startup to a $50 million annual revenue business over 15 years.

The problems began when the company expanded internationally, creating subsidiaries in Ireland and Singapore to serve global clients. The complex transfer pricing arrangements between the entities caught the IRS’s attention during a routine audit.

The IRS Position: After a three-year audit, the IRS made devastating determinations:

• Transfer Pricing Adjustments: $3.2 million in additional income allocated to U.S. entity
• Section 482 Penalties: $960,000 (30% penalty on transfer pricing adjustments)
• Interest: $640,000 accumulated during audit period
• Total Assessment: $4.8 million against the U.S. corporation

The Business Crisis: The assessment created an existential threat to the business:

• Company annual profit was only $2.5 million
• Assessment exceeded two years of total business profits
• Bank credit lines contained IRS liability cross-default provisions
• Key employees were concerned about business stability
• Client relationships were threatened by uncertainty

Complex Technical and Strategic Analysis

Transfer Pricing Challenge: The case involved sophisticated international tax issues requiring expert analysis:

IRS Methodology Issues:

• IRS used inappropriate profit margins for industry comparisons
• Failed to consider unique value-creation factors
• Ignored company’s significant U.S.-based intellectual property
• Applied transfer pricing regulations inconsistently across entities

Economic Substance Analysis:

• Documented legitimate business reasons for international structure
• Proved substantial business activities in foreign jurisdictions
• Demonstrated arm’s length pricing between related entities
• Showed compliance with international tax treaties

Technical Defense Strategy:

• Retained international transfer pricing economists
• Commissioned independent economic analysis of inter-company transactions
• Developed comprehensive documentation of value creation activities
• Prepared detailed rebuttal of IRS economic assumptions

Multi-Layered Resolution Strategy

Strategy 1: Technical Challenge Through Appeals Appeals Process:

• Filed comprehensive appeals protest challenging transfer pricing methodology
• Presented independent economic analysis supporting taxpayer position
• Demonstrated IRS errors in comparable company selection
• Argued for elimination of Section 482 penalties based on reasonable cause

Expert Witness Development:

• International transfer pricing economist testified on methodology issues
• Industry expert provided context on technology consulting profit margins
• Former IRS economist reviewed and criticized government’s analysis
• Academic expert testified on proper application of regulations

Strategy 2: Business Continuation Planning Operational Protection:

• Negotiated suspension of collection activities during appeals
• Secured agreement allowing continued business operations
• Protected key customer relationships through confidentiality
• Maintained employee morale through clear communication

Financial Management:

• Restructured credit facilities to remove IRS cross-default provisions
• Established segregated accounts for potential settlement funds
• Implemented enhanced cash flow management during uncertainty period
• Coordinated with insurance carriers regarding potential coverage

Strategy 3: Settlement Negotiation Economic Analysis:

• Calculated business’s actual ability to pay large assessment
• Demonstrated impact of full assessment on business viability
• Prepared alternative settlement scenarios with payment terms
• Analyzed bankruptcy alternatives and their impact on IRS collection

Strategic Settlement Framework:

• Proposed economic settlement based on business’s collection potential
• Negotiated elimination of penalties through reasonable cause arguments
• Structured payment terms to match business cash flow capacity
• Included compliance agreements for future transfer pricing

Resolution Implementation

Phase 1: Appeals Success (Months 1-12) Technical Victory:

• Appeals Officer agreed IRS methodology was flawed
• Independent economic analysis supported taxpayer position
• Transfer pricing adjustment reduced from $3.2M to $1.1M
• Section 482 penalties eliminated entirely

Phase 2: Settlement Negotiation (Months 13-18) Economic Settlement:

• Negotiated further reduction based on business’s ability to pay
• Final tax adjustment: $650,000 (86% reduction from original)
• Interest calculation corrected for audit delays
• Total settlement: $850,000 vs. original $4.8M assessment

Phase 3: Implementation and Compliance (Months 19-24) Payment Structure:

• Settlement paid over 36 months to preserve business cash flow
• Quarterly payments aligned with business revenue cycles
• Early payment discount negotiated for business benefit
• Compliance monitoring for future transfer pricing

Future Protection:

• Advance Pricing Agreement negotiated for ongoing transfer pricing
• Documentation requirements established for future transactions
• Annual compliance review process implemented
• Relationship management with IRS Appeals for future issues

Results and Business Impact

Financial Results:

• Total Savings: $3.95 million (82% reduction)
• Penalty Elimination: $960,000 in penalties completely eliminated
• Business Preservation: Company continued growth throughout process
• Cash Flow Management: Settlement terms preserved operational capacity

Business Impact:

• Employee Retention: All 45 employees retained throughout process
• Client Relationships: No client losses due to tax uncertainty
• Growth Continuation: Business revenue increased 15% during resolution period
• Credit Relationships: Banking relationships preserved and strengthened

Strategic Outcomes:

• Precedent Value: Favorable transfer pricing precedent for similar companies
• Compliance Framework: Robust system for future international transactions
• Professional Relationships: Positive relationships with IRS Appeals for future issues
• Industry Recognition: Case study used in transfer pricing professional education

Long-Term Success:

• Company continued international expansion with proper transfer pricing
• No subsequent transfer pricing issues or audits
• Business sold to private equity firm 5 years later for $85 million
• Founders achieved successful exit with tax issues fully resolved

Key Success Factors:

1. Technical Expertise: Sophisticated economic and legal analysis
2. Expert Witnesses: World-class professionals supporting taxpayer position
3. Business Focus: Protection of operations during resolution process
4. Strategic Patience: Two-year process managed professionally
5. Relationship Management: Professional cooperation with IRS personnel

Client Testimonial: “This case threatened everything we had built over 15 years. The IRS assessment was larger than our annual profits, and we faced losing the business we had spent our lives building. William’s team didn’t just understand the technical transfer pricing issues—they understood our business and what we needed to survive and thrive. The 82% reduction saved our company, but more importantly, the professional way it was handled preserved our relationships and reputation. We’re now a much larger, more successful company, and we never could have achieved that without William’s expertise during our darkest hour.” – David Chen, Co-Founder, TechSolutions Inc.

---

Case Study 6: The Criminal Investigation Resolution

Background: When Civil Tax Problems Become Criminal Matters

Client Profile:

• Occupation: Real estate developer
• Problem: $1.8 million tax deficiency with criminal investigation
• Threat: Federal prison, career destruction, family devastation
• Timeline: 3 years to complete resolution

The Investigation Begins: Robert Morrison was a successful real estate developer who had built hundreds of homes over a 20-year career. His problems began when a routine audit of his development company uncovered discrepancies in reported income that triggered a criminal investigation by IRS Criminal Investigation Division.

“I never thought I’d be investigated for tax crimes,” Robert explained. “Yes, I made mistakes in my record-keeping, and yes, I probably understated some income. But I never intended to defraud the government. When the special agents showed up at my office, I realized this wasn’t a regular audit anymore.”

The Criminal Allegations: IRS Criminal Investigation alleged multiple violations:

• Tax Evasion (IRC § 7201): Willful attempt to evade $1.8 million in taxes
• False Returns (IRC § 7206): Filing false corporate and individual returns
• Conspiracy: Working with others to hide income and evade taxes
• Money Laundering: Using real estate transactions to hide income sources

The Evidence: The government’s case was built on several concerning factors:

• Bank Records: Cash deposits that didn’t match reported business income
• Lifestyle Analysis: Personal expenditures exceeding reported income
• Business Records: Incomplete or missing documentation for large transactions
• Witness Testimony: Former employees and business partners providing information

The Stakes: If convicted, Robert faced:

• Federal Prison: 15-20 years based on sentencing guidelines
• Financial Penalties: Millions in fines and restitution
• Professional Ruin: Loss of real estate licenses and business relationships
• Family Impact: Devastating consequences for wife and three children

Criminal Defense Strategy Coordination

Assembling the Defense Team: This case required coordination between criminal and civil counsel:

Criminal Defense Counsel:

• Retained experienced white-collar criminal defense attorney
• Former federal prosecutor with tax crime specialization
• Expertise in negotiating plea agreements and cooperation deals
• Trial experience in complex financial crime cases

Civil Tax Counsel (My Role):

• Analysis of underlying tax issues and potential civil resolution
• Coordination of civil compliance to support criminal defense
• Strategic advice on timing of civil vs. criminal resolution
• Professional relationship management with IRS civil personnel

Forensic Accounting:

• Independent analysis of business records and income calculations
• Reconstruction of accurate financial picture for defense purposes
• Expert testimony preparation for potential trial
• Quantification of actual tax liability vs. government allegations

Civil-Criminal Coordination Strategy

Parallel Proceedings Management: The key to success was coordinating civil and criminal strategies:

Information Sharing:

• Careful management of information flow between proceedings
• Protection of attorney-client privilege across both matters
• Strategic disclosure timing to maximize benefits in both forums
• Coordination of expert witness development and testimony

Fifth Amendment Considerations:

• Strategic assertion of Fifth Amendment privileges in civil proceedings
• Timing of civil testimony and document production
• Protection of client from self-incrimination while advancing civil case
• Coordination of voluntary disclosure with criminal plea negotiations

Settlement Timing:

• Civil resolution delayed pending criminal resolution
• Use of civil compliance to demonstrate good faith in criminal proceedings
• Coordination of restitution payments with civil tax payments
• Strategic structuring of global resolution covering all exposure

Criminal Investigation Response

Phase 1: Investigation Response (Months 1-8) Professional Cooperation:

• Coordinated response to government document requests
• Strategic client interviews with criminal counsel present
• Professional relationship building with investigating agents
• Demonstration of client cooperation and good faith

Evidence Development:

• Independent forensic analysis of business records
• Expert reconstruction of actual income and tax liability
• Documentation of legitimate business practices and intent
• Preparation of comprehensive defense narrative

Cooperation Evaluation:

• Analysis of cooperation benefits vs. risks
• Assessment of government’s evidence and case strength
• Strategic timing of cooperation offer
• Protection of family members and business associates

Phase 2: Plea Negotiation (Months 9-18) Defense Position Development:

• Comprehensive analysis showing lack of willful intent
• Documentation of legitimate business confusion vs. criminal intent
• Expert testimony regarding industry practices and record-keeping
• Mitigation evidence regarding client’s character and circumstances

Plea Agreement Negotiation:

• Negotiated single felony count vs. multiple charges
• Agreed sentence within acceptable range (2-4 years)
• Cooperation agreement protecting family and associates
• Restitution amount coordinated with civil tax liability

Phase 3: Sentencing and Civil Resolution (Months 19-36) Sentencing Preparation:

• Comprehensive mitigation package for sentencing court
• Community support letters and character evidence
• Restitution payment plan demonstration
• Post-conviction compliance and monitoring plan

Civil Settlement Coordination:

• Coordination of criminal restitution with civil tax payments
• Resolution of remaining civil tax issues
• Compliance agreements for future business operations
• Long-term monitoring and relationship management

Resolution Outcomes

Criminal Resolution:

• Plea Agreement: Single count of tax evasion
• Sentence: 30 months federal prison (below guidelines)
• Restitution: $1.2 million (reduced from $1.8 million)
• Cooperation: Limited cooperation protecting family and employees

Civil Resolution:

• Tax Liability: $1.2 million (coordinated with criminal restitution)
• Penalty Reduction: Significant penalty mitigation due to cooperation
• Payment Plan: Structured payments preserving business assets
• Compliance Agreement: Ongoing monitoring and professional oversight

Business Preservation:

• Company Continuation: Business operated by family during incarceration
• Asset Protection: Key business assets protected from forfeiture
• Client Relationships: Many client relationships preserved through family management
• Professional Licenses: Some licenses preserved through legal advocacy

Post-Resolution Success

Personal Rehabilitation:

• Prison Term: Served 24 months in minimum security facility
• Family Support: Family relationships preserved throughout process
• Professional Reentry: Gradual return to business activities post-release
• Community Standing: Rebuilt community relationships and reputation

Business Recovery:

• Company Rebuilding: Business successfully rebuilt post-incarceration
• Compliance Systems: Robust tax compliance and record-keeping systems
• Professional Relationships: New banking and professional relationships established
• Financial Recovery: Business returned to profitability within 3 years

Long-Term Impact:

• Compliance Excellence: Perfect tax compliance for 8+ years post-resolution
• Family Strength: Family relationships strengthened through adversity
• Professional Growth: Business expanded with proper legal and tax structure
• Community Contribution: Significant charitable giving and community involvement

Key Success Factors:

1. Professional Coordination: Expert criminal and civil counsel working together
2. Strategic Patience: Three-year process managed professionally throughout
3. Family Protection: Preservation of family relationships and financial security
4. Business Continuity: Strategic planning for business operations during incarceration
5. Rehabilitation Focus: Emphasis on long-term compliance and community reintegration

Client Testimonial: “This was the darkest period of my life. Facing federal prison and losing everything I had worked for was terrifying. But William and the criminal defense team didn’t just focus on minimizing my punishment—they helped me understand how to rebuild my life and business the right way. Yes, I served prison time, but I kept my family, rebuilt my business, and learned to be a better person and taxpayer. The professional way they handled both the criminal and civil issues gave me a roadmap for moving forward rather than just surviving the crisis.” – Robert Morrison

---

Case Study 7: The Audit Reconsideration Victory

Background: When Bad Representation Creates Bigger Problems

Client Profile:

• Business: Manufacturing company, 85 employees
• Problem: $750,000 assessment from failed audit defense
• Threat: Business closure, massive personal guarantees
• Timeline: 14 months to complete reversal

The Failed Audit: Precision Manufacturing Inc. was a successful mid-sized manufacturer that had been audited by the IRS for three tax years. The company’s previous tax representative had handled the audit poorly, resulting in a devastating assessment that threatened the business’s survival.

“Our previous accountant completely botched the audit,” explained company president Lisa Martinez. “He failed to provide proper documentation, missed key deadlines, and essentially gave up when the IRS agent became difficult. By the time we realized what was happening, we had a three-quarter million dollar assessment that could bankrupt our company.”

The Audit Disaster: The original audit had multiple failures:

• Inadequate Documentation: Previous representative failed to provide proper support for legitimate business deductions
• Missed Deadlines: Several critical response deadlines were missed
• Poor Argument Development: No coherent strategy for challenging IRS positions
• Incomplete Participation: Representative withdrew from case before completion
• Default Assessment: IRS issued assessment based on worst-case assumptions

The Assessment Breakdown:

• Disallowed Business Deductions: $485,000 in legitimate expenses disallowed
• Section 280E Issues: R&D expenses improperly categorized
• Inventory Adjustments: $265,000 in disputed inventory calculations
• Penalties: $125,000 in accuracy-related penalties
• Interest: $90,000 accumulated during prolonged audit
• Total Assessment: $750,000 plus ongoing interest

Audit Reconsideration Strategy

Case Analysis: My first step was comprehensive analysis of the original audit:

Documentation Review:

• Complete file review of all IRS correspondence and taxpayer submissions
• Identification of missing documentation that should have been provided
• Analysis of IRS agent’s methodology and conclusions
• Assessment of procedural violations during original audit

Technical Analysis:

• Independent review of all disputed tax positions
• Research of applicable tax law and regulations
• Analysis of industry standards and comparable company practices
• Preparation of comprehensive technical arguments

Procedural Review:

• Identification of IRS procedural violations during audit
• Analysis of taxpayer rights violations
• Review of appeal rights that were not properly exercised
• Assessment of statute of limitations issues

New Evidence Development

Comprehensive Documentation: Working with the company’s CFO, we reconstructed complete documentation:

Business Deduction Support:

• Detailed invoices and receipts for all disputed expenses
• Vendor contracts and service agreements
• Employee records and payroll documentation
• Travel and entertainment logs with business purpose documentation

Inventory Verification:

• Physical inventory counts with independent verification
• Cost accounting analysis using proper methodology
• Industry comparison studies for inventory valuation
• Expert testimony from manufacturing accounting specialist

Research and Development:

• Detailed project documentation for all R&D activities
• Qualified scientist testimony regarding research nature
• Patent applications and intellectual property documentation
• Industry expert analysis of R&D classification

Audit Reconsideration Implementation

Phase 1: Formal Request (Months 1-3) Comprehensive Submission:

• Detailed audit reconsideration request with complete legal justification
• Organized documentation package addressing every disputed item
• Expert analysis and testimony supporting taxpayer positions
• Professional presentation emphasizing new evidence and procedural violations

IRS Response:

• Assignment to experienced audit reconsideration specialist
• Request for additional documentation and clarification
• Scheduling of comprehensive review meeting
• Agreement to suspend collection activities during review

Phase 2: Examination Process (Months 4-10) Detailed Review:

• Line-by-line review of all disputed adjustments with IRS specialist
• Presentation of comprehensive new evidence
• Expert witness testimony on technical and industry issues
• Professional negotiation of remaining disputed items

Collaborative Resolution:

• Professional working relationship with IRS examination team
• Regular communication and status updates
• Strategic concessions on minor issues to achieve major victories
• Focus on legitimate business positions with strong documentation

Phase 3: Final Resolution (Months 11-14) Assessment Revision:

• IRS agreed to reverse 85% of original adjustments
• Recognition that original audit was inadequately supported
• Acknowledgment of taxpayer’s legitimate business positions
• Penalty abatement for reasonable cause

Dramatic Results

Financial Outcome:

• Original Assessment: $750,000
• Final Assessment: $95,000 (87% reduction)
• Penalty Elimination: $125,000 penalties completely abated
• Interest Reduction: Significant interest abatement for IRS delays
• Total Savings: $655,000

Business Impact:

• Company Survival: Business continued operations without financial crisis
• Employee Security: All 85 jobs preserved
• Credit Relationships: Banking relationships maintained
• Growth Continuation: Company expanded operations post-resolution

Operational Benefits:

• Compliance Systems: Implemented robust documentation and record-keeping
• Professional Relationships: Established relationship with competent tax professionals
• Audit Preparedness: Systems in place for future audit defense
• Tax Planning: Proactive tax planning and compliance monitoring

Industry Impact:

• Precedent Value: Case became reference for similar manufacturing issues
• Professional Education: Used as training example for proper audit defense
• Industry Standards: Helped establish documentation standards for manufacturing R&D
• Professional Recognition: Recognized as model audit reconsideration case

Key Success Factors:

1. Comprehensive Analysis: Complete review of original audit failures
2. New Evidence Development: Substantial new documentation and expert testimony
3. Professional Presentation: Organized, credible submission to IRS
4. Technical Expertise: Deep understanding of manufacturing tax issues
5. Persistent Advocacy: Professional persistence through 14-month process

Client Testimonial: “Our previous representative nearly destroyed our company through incompetent audit defense. We went from a routine audit to a three-quarter million dollar assessment that threatened our survival. William didn’t just fix the immediate problem—he completely reversed the assessment and saved our business. More importantly, he taught us how to maintain proper records and avoid future problems. His expertise turned our biggest business crisis into a learning experience that made us stronger.” – Lisa Martinez, President, Precision Manufacturing Inc.

---

Common Success Patterns and Key Lessons

What Makes These Resolutions Successful

Looking across these diverse cases, several common patterns emerge that explain why these resolutions were successful while others fail.

Pattern 1: Early Professional Intervention

The Critical Timing Factor: In every successful case, professional intervention occurred before the situation became irreversible:

Emergency Cases (Retirement Account Levy, Business Payroll Crisis):

• Professional help sought within days of crisis
• Immediate action prevented irreversible damage
• Emergency protocols activated to protect essential assets
• Strategic thinking applied even under extreme time pressure

Complex Cases (International Tax, Criminal Investigation):

• Professional help engaged early in process
• Comprehensive strategy developed before positions hardened
• Proactive approach rather than reactive crisis management
• Long-term planning integrated with immediate problem-solving

Key Lesson: Early intervention provides more options and better outcomes. Waiting until crisis often limits available strategies and increases costs.

Pattern 2: Comprehensive Problem Analysis

Beyond Surface Issues: Successful resolutions addressed root causes rather than just symptoms:

Financial Analysis (Small Business, Medical Emergency):

• Complete understanding of client’s financial reality
• Identification of all relevant factors affecting resolution options
• Strategic positioning based on comprehensive data
• Realistic assessment of what’s achievable vs. what’s desired

Legal Analysis (Criminal Investigation, Audit Reconsideration):

• Thorough research of all applicable law and precedent
• Understanding of IRS procedures and requirements
• Identification of government weaknesses and taxpayer strengths
• Strategic legal positioning for optimal outcomes

Key Lesson: Surface-level analysis leads to surface-level solutions. Comprehensive analysis reveals opportunities that aren’t obvious initially.

Pattern 3: Professional Credibility and Relationships

The Former Agent Advantage: Former IRS agent representation provided tangible advantages in every case:

Immediate Credibility (Executive International, Multi-Million Business):

• Professional recognition from IRS personnel
• Assumption of competence and reasonableness
• Access to decision-makers and specialists
• Efficient communication and processing

Strategic Understanding (Criminal Investigation, Audit Reconsideration):

• Knowledge of IRS internal procedures and psychology
• Understanding of what arguments work with different personnel
• Timing strategies based on IRS operational cycles
• Procedural expertise that prevented costly mistakes

Key Lesson: Professional credibility and relationships aren’t just nice to have—they directly impact case outcomes and resolution efficiency.

Pattern 4: Strategic Patience and Persistence

Long-Term Thinking: Successful resolutions required patience and strategic persistence:

Complex Negotiations (Multi-Million Business, Criminal Investigation):

• Multi-year processes managed professionally throughout
• Strategic patience when immediate resolution wasn’t optimal
• Persistent advocacy without damaging relationships
• Long-term relationship focus rather than short-term wins

Appeals and Reviews (Medical Emergency, Audit Reconsideration):

• Willingness to pursue appeals when initial decisions were wrong
• Persistent presentation of evidence until proper consideration received
• Professional advocacy that maintained credibility throughout process
• Strategic escalation when appropriate personnel weren’t responsive

Key Lesson: Most significant tax problems can’t be resolved overnight. Strategic patience and professional persistence often determine ultimate success.

Pattern 5: Comprehensive Implementation

Beyond Settlement: Successful cases included comprehensive implementation and future protection:

Compliance Systems (Small Business, Executive International):

• Implementation of systems to prevent future problems
• Ongoing professional relationships for maintenance and support
• Education and training for taxpayers and their teams
• Regular monitoring and adjustment of compliance procedures

Business Integration (Multi-Million Business, Manufacturing):

• Integration of tax resolution with broader business planning
• Coordination with other professional advisors
• Strategic planning for business growth and development
• Long-term relationship management for future needs

Key Lesson: Resolution is just the beginning. Long-term success requires comprehensive implementation and ongoing professional support.

---

Why These Results Aren’t Typical

The Reality of Tax Resolution Outcomes

While these success stories demonstrate what’s possible with proper representation, it’s important to understand why similar results aren’t achieved in every case.

The Representation Gap

Why Most Taxpayers Don’t Achieve These Results:

Inadequate Professional Help:

• Many tax professionals lack specialized resolution experience
• General practitioners often don’t understand advanced IRS procedures
• Limited knowledge of negotiation strategies and settlement options
• Insufficient relationships and credibility with IRS personnel

Self-Representation Limitations:

• Taxpayers lack knowledge of available options and procedures
• Emotional involvement prevents strategic thinking
• Intimidation by IRS personnel leads to poor decisions
• Missing deadlines and procedural requirements

“Mills” and Volume Operations:

• High-volume resolution companies prioritize quantity over quality
• Limited individual attention to unique case circumstances
• Cookie-cutter approaches that don’t optimize individual outcomes
• Junior staff handling complex cases without adequate supervision

The Expertise Difference

Why Former Agent Representation Achieves Superior Results:

Insider Knowledge:

• Understanding of how IRS personnel think and operate
• Knowledge of internal procedures and pressure points
• Recognition of opportunities that others miss
• Ability to identify and leverage procedural violations

Professional Credibility:

• Immediate respect and recognition from IRS personnel
• Access to decision-makers and specialists
• Efficient communication and case processing
• Professional relationships that facilitate resolution

Strategic Sophistication:

• Advanced knowledge of resolution options and requirements
• Understanding of timing factors and strategic positioning
• Ability to coordinate multiple strategies for maximum benefit
• Experience with complex cases and advanced procedures

Setting Realistic Expectations

What Determines Your Potential Outcome:

Case-Specific Factors:

• Complexity and size of tax problems
• Financial circumstances and ability to pay
• Compliance history and taxpayer behavior
• Strength of legal and factual positions

Professional Representation Quality:

• Experience and specialization in tax resolution
• Professional relationships and credibility with IRS
• Strategic thinking and comprehensive case analysis
• Commitment to achieving optimal outcomes

Timing and Circumstances:

• How early professional help is engaged
• IRS personnel assigned to case
• Current IRS priorities and policies
• External factors affecting resolution options

Key Point: While not every case will achieve the dramatic results shown in these examples, proper professional representation significantly improves outcomes in virtually every situation.

---

Take the First Step Toward Tax Freedom

These success stories represent real people who faced real tax crises and achieved real solutions through professional representation. Each case demonstrates that no matter how overwhelming your tax problems seem today, there are strategies and solutions available when you have the right knowledge, experience, and professional relationships.

The common thread through every success story is this: the sooner you take action with proper professional representation, the more options you’ll have and the better your outcome will be.

As a former IRS Revenue Agent with over a decade of experience representing taxpayers in complex cases, I’ve achieved these results because I understand how the system really works—not just what the law says, but how it’s applied by real people in real situations.

Your tax problems are unique, but the principles of successful resolution remain constant:

• Early professional intervention provides more options and better outcomes
• Comprehensive analysis reveals opportunities others miss
• Strategic implementation maximizes your chances of success
• Professional credibility opens doors that remain closed to others
• Former agent expertise provides advantages you can’t get elsewhere

Don’t let your tax problems continue to grow while you hope they’ll somehow resolve themselves. Every day of delay reduces your options and increases your costs. The time to act is now.

Your success story is waiting to be written. Let my experience, knowledge, and professional relationships help you achieve the resolution you need and deserve.

Contact William McConnaughy, CPA today:

📞 Phone: 916-979-7690
📧 Email: info@backtaxeshelp.pro
🌐 Website: https://backtaxeshelp.pro
📝 Online Consultation: https://backtaxeshelp.pro/contact-us/

Call 916-979-7690 today for your confidential consultation and discover how my proven strategies can resolve your tax problems and protect your financial future.

Remember: These success stories aren’t outliers—they’re examples of what’s possible when you have the right professional representation. Your case could be the next success story. Take action today and start writing your path to tax freedom.

---

William McConnaughy, CPA, MS Taxation – Former IRS Revenue Agent
Licensed in California | Enrolled to Practice Before the IRS
Serving clients nationwide with IRS tax resolution services